Friday, December 17, 2010

Revenge or Understanding? The Rule of Law or of Love..?








ALL LEGAL SYSTEMS are nothing but the revenge of society -- revenge against those who don't fit in with the system. According to me, law is not for protection of the just, it is for protection of the crowd mind -- whether it is just or unjust does not matter. Law is against the individual and for the crowd. It is an effort to reduce the individual and his freedom, and his possibility of being himself.

The latest scientific researches are very revealing -- perhaps ten percent of the people who are termed criminals are not responsible for their crimes; their crimes are genetic, they inherit them. Just as a blind man is not responsible for his blindness, a murderer is not responsible for his murderousness. Both inherit the tendency -- one of blindness, another of committing murder.

Now it is an established scientific fact that punishing anybody for any crime is simply idiotic. It is almost like punishing somebody because he has tuberculosis -- sending him to jail because he is suffering from cancer. All criminals are sick, psychologically and spiritually both.

In my vision of a commune, the courts will not consist of law experts, they will consist of people who understand genetics and how crimes are inherited from generation to generation. They have to decide not for any punishment, because every punishment is wrong -- not only wrong, every punishment is criminal.

The man who has committed anything wrong has to be sent to the right institution -- a psychiatric institution, or a psychoanalytic school, or maybe a hospital, to be operated on. He needs our sympathy, our love, our help. Instead of giving him our sympathy and love, for centuries we have been giving him punishment. Man has committed so much cruelty behind such beautiful names as order, law, justice.

The new man will not have any jails and will not have any judges and will not have any legal experts.

These are absolutely unnecessary, cancerous growths on the body of society. There will certainly have to be sympathetic scientists, meditative, compassionate beings to work out why it happened that a certain man committed rape: is he really responsible? According to me, on no account is he responsible. Either he has committed rape because of the priests and the religions teaching celibacy, repression for thousands of years -- this is the outcome of a repressive morality -- or biologically he has hormones which compel him to commit rape.

Although you are living in a modern society, most of you are not contemporaries because you are not aware of the reality that science goes on discovering. Your educational system prevents you from knowing it, your religions prevent you from knowing it, your governments prevent you from knowing it.

The man who is committing rape perhaps has more hormones than those moral people who manage to live with one woman for their whole life, thinking that they are moral. A man with more hormones will need more women; so will be the case with a woman. It is not a question of morality, it is a question of biology. A man who commits rape needs all our sympathy, needs a certain operation in which his extra hormones are removed, and he will cool down, calm down.

To punish him is simply an exercise in stupidity.

By punishing, you cannot change his hormones. Throwing him in jail, you will create a homosexual, some kind of pervert. In American jails they have done a survey: thirty percent of the inmates are homosexuals. That is according to their confession; we don't know how many have not confessed. Thirty percent is not a small number. In monasteries the number is bigger -- fifty percent, sixty percent. But the responsibility lies with our idiotic clinging to religions which are out of date, which are not supported and nourished by scientific research.

The new commune of man will be based on science, not on superstition. If somebody does something which is harmful to the commune as such, then his body has to be looked into; perhaps he needs some physiological change or biological change. His mind has to be looked into -- perhaps he needs some psychoanalysis. The deepest possibility is that neither the body nor the mind are of much help; that means he needs a deep spiritual regeneration, a deep meditative cleansing.

Instead of courts, we should have meditative centers of different kinds, so every unique individual can find his own way.

Instead of law experts, who are simply irrelevant -- they are parasites sucking our blood -- we will have scientific people of different persuasions, because somebody may have a chemical defect, somebody may have a biological defect, somebody may have a physiological defect. We need all these kinds of experts, of all persuasions and schools of psychology, all types of meditators, and we can transform the poor people who have been victims of unknown forces -- and have been punished by us. They have suffered in a double sense.

First, they are suffering from an unknown biological force. Secondly, they are suffering at the hands of your judges -- who are nothing but butchers, henchmen -- your advocates, all kinds of your law experts, your jailers. It is simply so insane that future human beings will not be able to believe it.

It is almost the same as in the past: mad people were beaten to cure their madness; people who were schizophrenic, who were thought to be possessed by ghosts, were beaten almost to death -- this was thought to be the treatment. Millions of people have died because of your great treatments.

Now we can simply say that those people were barbarous, ignorant, primitive. The same will be said about us. I am already saying it: that your courts are barbarous, your laws are barbarous.

The very idea of punishment is unscientific.

There is nobody in the world who is a criminal; everybody is sick, and needs sympathy and a scientific cure, and most of your crimes will disappear.

But first private property has to disappear: private property creates thieves, dacoits, pickpockets, priests, politicians.

Politics is a disease.

Man has suffered from many diseases and he has not even been aware that they are diseases. He has been punishing small criminals and he has been worshipping great criminals. Who is Alexander the Great? A great criminal; he murdered people on a mass scale. Adolf Hitler alone killed millions of people, but he will be remembered in history as a great leader of men.

Napoleon Bonaparte, Ivan the Terrible, Nadirshah, Genghis Khan, Tamerlane are all mass-scale criminals. But their crimes are so big, that perhaps you cannot conceive.... They have killed millions of people, burned millions of people alive, but they are not thought of as criminals. And a small pickpocket, who takes away a one-dollar note from your pocket will be punished by the court.

Once private property disappears.... And in a commune there is going to be no private property, everything belongs to all; naturally, stealing will disappear. You don't steal water and accumulate it, you don't steal air. A commune has to create everything in such abundance that even a retarded person cannot think of accumulating it. What is the point? It is always available, fresh.

Money has to disappear from society.

A commune does not need money. Your needs should be fulfilled by the commune. All have to produce, and all have to make the commune richer, affluent, accepting the fact that a few people will be lazy. But there is no harm in it.

In every family you will find somebody lazy. Somebody is a poet, somebody is a painter, somebody simply goes on playing on his flute – but you love the person. A certain percentage of lazy people will be respectfully allowed. In fact a commune that does not have lazy people will be a little less rich than other communes which have a few lazy people who do nothing but meditate, who do nothing but go on playing on their guitar while others are toiling in the fields. A little more human outlook is needed; these people are not useless. They may not seem to be productive of commodities, but they are producing a certain joyful, cheerful atmosphere. Their contribution is meaningful and significant.

With the disappearance of money as a means of exchange, many crimes will disappear.

As religions disappear, with their repressive superstitions and moralities, crimes like rape, perversions like homosexuality, diseases like AIDS will become unheard of. And when from the very beginning every child is brought up with a reverence for life -- reverence for the trees because they are alive, reverence for animals, reverence for birds -- do you think such a child one day can be a murderer? It will be almost inconceivable.

And if life is joyous, full of songs and dances, do you think somebody will desire to commit suicide? Ninety percent of crimes will disappear automatically; only ten percent of crimes may remain, which are genetic, which need hospitalization – but not jails, prisons, not people to be sentenced to death. This is all so ugly, so inhuman, so insane.

The new commune, the new man, can live without any law, without any order. Love will be his law, understanding will be his order.

Science will be, in every difficult situation, his last resort.

-OSHO

Thursday, December 16, 2010

future phones!

Window Phone

(Image via yankodesign.com)The translucent touchscreen device created by Seunghan Song shames the weather bureau. The Window Phone makes accurate weather predictions and changes its display to reflect its surrounding climate. The phone doesn’t have keys, just blow on the screen to switch the phone into dialling and handwriting mode. But remember, this phone is just a concept!

Cobalto

(Image via petitinvention.wordpress.com)The transparent Cobalto mobile phone is designed by Mac Funamizu. It has the ability to project holographic 3D images. Made from deformable metal, it can either use the standard number buttons or the touchscreen feature. This outlandish mobile phone concept will be market ready in a few years.

Mobile Script

(Image via behance.net)Created by Aleksandr Mukomelov, the Mobile Script concept phone has two touchscreens. One of them is a flexible OLED display and the other one is a conventional screen. This revolutionary handset is covered with photo sensitive nano material that charges the device via sunlight.

Magic Stone

Image via behance.netConcept phone ‘Magic Stone’ is another innovative design by Aleksandr Mulomelov. This new generation mobile phone has a touchscreen, constant internet access, holographic projection display and it gets charged via solar energy. The user can accomplish any shape, color, pattern and picture for the phone’s case.

Kambala Mobile Phone

(Image via yankodesign.com)Iishat Garipov’s Kambala mobile phone is a captivating concept that transforms into an earphone. Kambala’s continuous flexi screen is fitted with lots of sensors which have the ability to transmit the image from the inside of the phone to the outside. It also has the ability to merge with your skin tone, rendering it almost invisible.

Nokia Morph

(Image via nokia.com)Nokia’s Morph utilizes nanotechnology to stretch, roll up and clean itself. This flexible nanotech device can be stretched and twisted into bracelet shapes or tablet forms. Morph is an inspirational and artistic concept that demonstrates how future cell phones might look.

Visual Sound

(Image via yankodesign.com)Suhyun Kim’s visual sound mobile phone is an innovative concept for the hearing impaired. Visual sound converts text input into voice stimulation and voice into text. It runs multiple applications and is a huge step taken by the cell phone designers for deaf people.

The Samsung Braille Phone

(Image via yankodesign.com)Designed by Seonkeun Park, the Braille Phone is a concept for the blind by Samsung. The Braille Phone has a smooth design and its keyboard is specially designed for the blind using the Braille printing system. EAP (electric active plastic) is used to create Braille figures, texts and Braille numbers on the cell phone.

Nokia 888

(Image via nokia888.com)Nokia 888 is an ergonomic communication device that changes forms according to user requirements. It’s easy to use, light and carefree. Nokia 888 uses liquid battery, flexible touch screen, speech recognition and touch sensitive body cover. It can be rolled, bent and carried in the pocked as a clip.

Maple Phone – A wooden cell phone concept

image via cameraphonesplaza.comMaple Phone is a compact slider phone made from real wood. It’s as functional as a normal cell phone. Maple Phone offers basic cell phone functionalities such as texting, calling, a digital camera and MP3 player. This distinctive touch sensitive handset is designed by Hyun Jin Toon and Eun Hak Lee.



Read more: http://www.brighthub.com/mobile/emerging-platforms/articles/76790.aspx#ixzz18HOk3u4H

Sunday, December 5, 2010

understanding women ~~~~osho~~~~


QUESTIONER: DRAUPADI, WHO IS ALSO KNOWN AS KRISHNAA, HAS BEEN SUBJECTED
TO HARSH CRITICISM AND DETRACTION, BUT KRISHNA LOVES HER TREMENDOUSLY. PLEASE SAY SOMETHING ABOUT HER IN THE CONTEXT OF OUR OWN TIME.



As among men Krishna baffles our understanding, so does Draupadi among women. and how the critics look at Draupadi says more about the critics themselves than about Draupadi. What we see in others is only a reflection; others only serve as mirrors to us. We see in others only that which we
want to see; in fact, we see what we are. We do nothing but project ourselves on the world.

It is difficult to understand Draupadi. But our difficulty does not come from this great woman, it really emanates from us. Our ideas and beliefs, our desires and hopes come in our way of understanding Draupadi.

To love five men together, to play wife to them at the same time is a great and arduous task. This needs to be understood rightly. Love does not have much to do with persons; it is a state of mind.
And love that is confined to a single person is a poor love. Let us go into this question of love in depth.
We all insist that one’s love should be confined to a single person – a man or a woman. If someone loves you, you want that he should love you and you alone, that he not share his love with another person. You would like to possess that person, to monopolize him or her. We not only want topossess things, we also want to possess men and women. And if we had our way we would possess even the sun and the moon and the stars. So we crave to monopolize love. Because we do not know what love is, we are prone to think that if it is shared with many it will disperse and dwindle and die.


But the truth is that the more love is shared, the more it grows. And when we try to restrict it, to control it – which is utterly unnatural and arbitrary – it dries up and eventually dies.
I am reminded of a beautiful story.
A Buddhist nun had a statue of Buddha made of sandalwood. She loved the statue and always kept it with her. Being a nun she traveled from place to place, where she mostly stayed in Buddhist temples and monasteries. And wherever she lived she worshipped her own statue of Buddha.
Once she happened to be a guest at the famous temple of a thousand Buddhas. This temple was known for its thousand statues of Buddha; it was filled with statues and statues. The nun, as usual, sat for her evening worship, and she burned incense before her statue of Buddha. But with the
passing breeze the perfume of the incense strayed to other statues of Buddhas which filled that temple.


The nun was distressed to see that while her own Buddha was deprived of the perfume, others had it in plenty. So she devised a funnel through which the smoke would ascend to her statue only. But this device, although successful, blackened the face of her Buddha and made it especially ugly. Of
course the nun was exceedingly miserable, because it was a rare statue of sandalwood, and she loved it. She went to the chief priest of the temple and said, ”My statue of Buddha has been ruined.What am I to do?”
The priest said, ”Such an accident, such an ugliness is bound to happen whenever someone tries to block the movement of truth and possess it for oneself. Truth by its nature has to be everywhere, it cannot be personalized and possessed,” Up to now, mankind has thought of love in terms of petty relationship – relationship between two persons. We have yet to know love that is a state of mind, and not just relationship. And this is what
comes in our way of understanding Draupadi
If I am loving, if love is the state of my being, then it is not possible to confine my love to a single person, or even a few persons. When love enters my life and becomes my nature, then I am capable of loving any number of people. Then it is not even a question of one or many; then I am loving,
and my love reaches everywhere. If I am loving to one and unloving to all others, even my love for the one will wither away.


It is impossible to be loving to one and unloving to the rest. If someone is loving just for an hour every day and remains unloving for the rest of the time, his lovelessness will
eventually smother his small love and turn his life into a wasteland of hate and hostility.
It is unfortunate that people all around the world are trying to capture love and keep it caged in their relationships. But it is not possible to make a captive of love, the moment you try to capture it, it ceases to be love. Love is like air; you cannot hold it in your fist. It is possible to have a little air on
your open palm, but if you try to enclose it in your fist, the air escapes. It is a paradox of life that when you try to imprison love, to put it in bondage, love degenerates and dies. And we have all killed love in our foolish attempts to possess it. Really we don’t know what love is.


We find it hard to understand how Draupadi could love five persons together. Not only we, even the five Pandava brothers had difficulty in understanding Draupadi. The trouble is understandable, even the Pandavas thought that Draupadi was more loving to one of them. Four of them believed that she
favored Arjuna in particular, and they felt envious of him. So they had a kind of division of her timeand attention. When one of the Pandava brothers was with her, others were debarred from visiting her.
Like us, they believed that it is impossible for someone to love more than one person at a time.
We cannot think of love as anything different from a relationship between two persons – a man and a woman. We cannot conceive that love is a state of being, it is not directed to individuals. Love, like air, sunshine and rain, is available to all without any distinctions.


We have our own ideas of what love is and should be, and that is why we misunderstand Draupadi.Despite our best efforts to understand her rightly, there is a lurking suspicion in our minds that there is an element of prostitution in Draupadi: our very definition of a sati, a faithful and loyal wife, turns Draupadi into a prostitute.
It is amazing that the tradition of this country respects Draupadi as one of the five most virtuous women of the past. The people who included her among the five great women of history must have
been extraordinarily intelligent. The fact that she was the common wife of five Pandavas was known to them, and that is what makes their evaluation of Draupadi tremendously significant. For them it did not matter whether love was confined to one or many; the real question was whether or not one
had love. They knew that if really there was love, it could flow endlessly in any number of channels; it could not be controlled and manipulated.

It was symbolic to say that Draupadi had five husbands; it meant that one could love five, fifty, five hundred thousand people at the same time. There is no
end to love’s power and capacity.
The day really loving people will walk on this earth, the personal ownership of love rampant today in the form of marriages, families and groups, will disappear. It will not mean that the love relationship between two human beings will be prohibited and declared to be sinful – that would be going to the other extreme of stupidity. No, everybody will be free to be himself, and to function within his limits and no one will impose his will and ideas on others. Love and freedom will go together.


Draupadi’s love is riverlike, overflowing. She does not deny her love even for a moment. Her marriage to the Pandava brothers is an extraordinary event – it came about almost playfully. The Pandavas came home with Draupadi, who they had won in a contest. They told their mother they had brought a very precious thing with them. Kunti, their mother, without asking what the precious object was, said, ”If it is precious then share it together.”
The Pandava brothers had no idea that their mother would say this; they just wanted to tease her.
But now they had to do their mother’s bidding; they made Draupadi their common wife. And she accepted it without complaint. It was possible because of her infinite love. She has so much that she loved all her husbands profoundly, yet never felt any shortage of love in her heart. She had
no difficulty whatsoever in playing her role as their common beloved, and she never discriminated between them.


Draupadi is certainly a unique woman. Women, in general, are very jealous; they really live in jealousy. If one wants to characterize man and woman, he can say that while ego is the chiefcharacteristic of man, jealousy is the chief characteristic of woman. Man lives by ego and woman by jealousy. Really jealousy is the passive form of ego, and ego is the active form of jealousy.
But here is a woman who rose above jealousy and pettiness; she loved the Pandavas without any reservations. In many ways Draupadi towered over her husbands who were very jealous of one another on account of her love. They remained in constant psychological conflict with each other,
while Draupadi went through this complex relationship with perfect ease and equanimity.
We are to blame for our failure to understand Draupadi. We think that love is a relationship between two persons, which it is not. And because of this misconception we have to go through all kinds of torment and misery in life. Love is a flower which once in a while blooms without any cause or purpose. It can happen to anyone who is open. And love accepts no bonds. no constraints on its freedom. But because society has fettered love in many ways we do everything to smother it, to escape it. Thus love has become so scarce, and we have to go without it. We live a loveless life.


We are a strange people; we can go without love, but we cannot love someone without possessing him or her. We can very well starve ourselves of love, but we cannot tolerate that the person I love should share his or her love with anybody else. To deprive others of love we can easily give up our
own share of it. We don’t know how terribly we suffer because of our ego and jealousy.
It is good to know that Draupadi is not a solitary case of this kind; she may be the last in a long line. The society that preceded Draupadi was matriarchal; perhaps Draupadi is the last vestige of that disintegrating social order. In a matriarchial society the mother was the head of the family and
descent was reckoned through the female line. In a matriarchy a woman did not belong to any man;
no man could possess her.


A kind of polyandry was in vogue for a long time, and Draupadi seems to be the last of it. Today there are only a few primitive tribes who practice polyandry. That is why the society of her times accepted Draupadi and her marriage and did not raise any objections. If
it was wrong, Kunti would have changed her instructions to her sons, but she did not. If there was anything immoral in polyandry even the Pandava brothers would have asked their mother to change her order. But nothing of the kind happened, because it was acceptable to the existing society.
It happens that a custom that is perfectly moral in one society appears completely immoral to another. Mohammed had nine wives, and his Koran allows every Mohammedan man to have four wives. In the context of modern societies, polygamy and polyandry are considered highly immoral.
And the prophet of Islam had nine wives. When he had his first marriage he was twenty-four years old, while his wife was forty.
But the society in which Mohammed was born was very different from ours and its circumstances were such that polygamy became both necessary and moral. They were warring tribes who
constantly fought among themselves. Consequently they were always short of male members – many of whom were killed in fighting – while the number of their women went on growing.



Out of four persons, three were women. So Mohammed ordained that each man should have four wives.
If it was not done, then three out of four women would have been forced to live a loveless life or take to prostitution. That would have been really immoral.
So polygamy became a necessity and it had a moral aura about it. And to set a bold example, Mohammed himself took nine women as his wives, and permitted each of his male followers to have four. No one in Arabia objected to it; there was nothing immoral about it.The society in which the Mahabharat happened was in the last stages of matriarchy, and therefore
polyandry was accepted. But that society is long dead and with it polygamy and polyandry are now things of the past. They have no relevance in a society where the numbers of men and women are in equal proportion.


When this balance is disturbed for some reason, customs like polygamy and
polyandry appear on the scene. So there was nothing immoral about Draupadi.
Even today I say that Draupadi was not an ordinary woman; she was unique and rare. The woman who loved five men together and loved them equally and who lived on their love could not be an ordinary woman. She was tremendously loving and it was indeed a great thing. We fail to understand
her because of our narrow idea of love.

MY FAVOURITE SONY ERICSSON MOBILE!






















Sony Ericsson XPERIA X8 Full Phone Specifications:

Dimensions99 x 54 x 15 mm
Weight104 g
Display- 3” TFT capacitive touchscreen, 16M colors
- 320 x 480 pixels
- Accelerometer sensor
- Timescape UI
- Scratch-resistant surface
Camera- 3.15 megapixels
- 2048 x 1536 pixels
Memory- Internal: 128 MB
- External: Up to 16GB microSD
Processor600 MHz
Operating SystemAndroid Os v1.6 Donut
Network- 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 (2G)
- 900 / 2100 (3G)
850 / 900 / 1900 / 2100 (3G)
Connectivity- 3G HSDPA
- Wi-Fi 802.11 b/g
- Bluetooth v2.0
- A-GPS
- microUSB 2.0
- 3.5 mm audio jack
Audio/Video formats- MP4/H.263/H.264/WMV (Video)
- MP3/eAAC+/WMA/WAV
Extras- Stereo FM
- TrackID music recognition
- Preloaded Google products
- Facebook App
- Doc viewer
BatteryStandard Li-Po 1200 mAh battery
ColorsWhite, Dark Blue/ White, Aqua Blue/ White, Pink/ White, Silver/ White
AvailabilityExpected release in Q3 2010